Performance of sows after hepatoprotectors' influence

  • O. V. Kornienko Dnіpropetrovsk State Agrarian and Economics University, Dnipro, Ukraine
  • V. G. Yefimov Dnіpropetrovsk State Agrarian and Economics University, Dnipro, Ukraine
Keywords: sows, piglets, performance, hepatoprotectors

Abstract

At sows often recorded liver disease that affects the health of both the sows and piglets received from them. Also, this affects reduced weight in piglets during suckling period. The aim was to study the effect of hepatoprotectors on performance of sows and piglets received from them. Studies were conducted on the sow large white breed of various age and number of farrows. For the study was formed 3 groups on the principle of similar groups of 40 animals each. Two groups were experimental, but the third – the control. Investigated the effectiveness of two commercial hepatoprotectors: “A” (carnitine hydrochloride 25,0; DL-methionine 10,0; choline chloride 18,75, magnesium sulphate10,0; sorbitol 200,0; tsinarin (extract of artichoke) – 5,0 mg/ml) and “B” (carnitine hydrochloride 50,0, cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12) 0,03; calcium pantothenate 7,5, nicotinamide 20,0, magnesium sulfate 200,0, sorbitol 250,0, succinic acid 20,0 mg/ml). Each preparation was used for 30 days before farrowing, within 7 days, once daily in the morning during feeding at a dose of 50 ml for each animal. Use of preparation was repeated per 1–2 days before farrow at same doses and duration. It was established that the number of piglets received was highest in the “B” group, which exceeded the indices of control animals to 14,3%. In group “A” received at 4,8% more piglets. The weight of piglets at birth was highest in group “A”, while in group “B” and the control is no different. Weight at weaning, similar to the increase of daily gain during sucking period, was higher in animals obtained from sows “A” group (respectively 12,5% and 14,2% more than control). Piglets “B” group had a lower rate of growth, however, also were higher compared to control animals (6,1%). The highest survival was noted among piglets, sows are received from group “A”. However, the incidence of piglets was lower in animals Group “B”. Use of hepatoprotectors increases the productive performance of sows, manifested by the increasing number of piglets born, increasing their growth and survival.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

O. V. Kornienko, Dnіpropetrovsk State Agrarian and Economics University, Dnipro, Ukraine
студентка
V. G. Yefimov, Dnіpropetrovsk State Agrarian and Economics University, Dnipro, Ukraine
к. вет. н., доцент

References

Britt J.H. Improving Sows Productivity through Management during Gestation, Lactation and after Weaning / J.H. Britt // J. Anim. Sci. – 1986. – Vol. 63, № 4. – P. 1288–1296.

Ковзов В.В. Обменные нарушения и патология репродукций у свиноматок / В.В. Ковзов // Учёные записки УО Витебская ГАВМ. – 2009. – Т. 45, Вып 2, Ч.1. – С. 26–29.

Акушерська патологія свиноматок за сучасних технологій ведення галузі свинарства / [М.І. Харенко, А.А. Черненко, Н.О. Афанасьєва, О.А. Костюченко] // Науковий вісник ветеринарної медицини. – 2014. – Вип. 13 (108). – С.257–259.

Костин М.Ю. Мониторинг заболеваний свиноматок и их влияние на уровень продуктивности / М.Ю. Костин, О.Л. Третьякова, И.В. Сирота // Актуальные проблемы производства свинины: Материалы XXIV заседания межвуз. корд. совета по свиноводству. – Персиановский: Донской ГАУ, 2015. – С. 93–98.

Петровский С.В. Репродуктивные качества и показатели роста приплода при печёночной патологии у свиноматок / С.В. Петровский, Н.К. Хлебус // Учёные записки УО Витебская ГАВМ. – 2013. – Т. 49, Вып 1, Ч.2. – С. 154–157.

Єфімов В.Г. Вміст вітамінів А і Е у крові свиноматок та отриманих від них поросят за внутрішньом’язового введення різних доз ретинолу ацетату / В.Г. Єфімов, Д.М. Софонова // Науково-технічний бюлетень НДЦ біобезпеки та екологічного контролю ресурсів АПК. – 2015. – Т. 3, № 4. – С. 127–131. Режим доступу – http://biosafety-center.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/03/26.pdf

Мерзленко Р.А. Профилактика гепатозов свиней с применением катозала, ковертала и янтарной кислоты / Р.А. Мерзленко, И.В. Бабанин // Учёные записки Казанской ГАВМ им. Н.Э. Баумана. – 2013. – Т. 214. – С. 282–286.

Quiniou N. Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance / N. Quiniou, J. Dagorn, D. Gaudre // Livestock Production Science. – 2002. – Vol. 78, № 1. – P. 63–70.

Milligan B.N. Within-litter birth weight variation in the domestic pig and its relation to pre-weaning survival, weight gain, and variation in weaning weights / B.N. Milligan, D. Fraser, D.L. Kramer // Livestock Production Science. – 2002. – Vol. 76, № 1–2. – P. 181–191.

Єфімов В.Г. Показники клітинного імунітету поросят на дорощуванні за впливу гумату натрію, бурштинової кислоти і мікроелементів / В.Г. Єфімов, В.М. Ракитянський // Науковий вісник Львівської НАВМ ім. С.З. Гжицького. – 2015. – Т. 17, № 3. – С. 32–37.

Швец О.М. Применение нового препарата “янтарный биостимулятор” для коррекции метаболического и иммунного статуса животных / О.М. Швец // Ветеринарная патология. – 2008. – № 1. – С. 92–95.

References

Britt, J.H. (1986). Improving Sows Productivity through Management during Gestation, Lactation and after Weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 63 (4), 1288–1296.

Kovzov, V.V. (2009). Obmennye narusheniya i patologiya reproduktsiy u svinomatok. Uchenye zapiski UO Vitebskaya GAVM. 45 (2, 1), 26–29. [in Russian].

Harenko, M.I., Chernenko, A.A., Afanas`yeva, N.O. & Kostyuchenko, O.A. (2014). Akushers'ka patologija svynomatok za suchasnyh tehnologij vedennja galuzi svynarstva. Naukovyj visnyk veterynarnoi' medycyny. 13 (108), 257–259. [in Ukrainian].

Kostin, M.Ju., Tret'jakova, O.L. & Sirота, I.V. (2015). Monitoring zabolevanij svinomatok i ih vlijanie na uroven' produktivnosti. Aktual'nye problemy proizvodstva svininy: Materialy XXIV zasedanija mezhvuz. kord. soveta po svinovodstvu. Persianovskij, Donskoj GAU, 93–98. [in Russian].

Petrovskij, S.V. & Hlebus, N.K. (2013). Reproduktivnye kachestva i pokazateli rosta priploda pri pechenochnoj patologii u svinomatok. Uchenye zapiski UO Vitebskaya GAVM. 49 (1, 2), 154–157. [in Russian].

Jefimov, V.G. & Sofonova, D.M. (2015). Vmist vitaminiv A i E u krovi svynomatok ta otrymanyh vid nyh porosjat za vnutrishn'om'jazovogo vvedennja riznyh doz retynolu acetatu. Science and Technology Bulletin of SRC for Biosafety and Environmental Control of AIC. 3 (4), 127–131. [in Ukrainian]. http://biosafety-center.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/03/26.pdf

Merzlenko, R.A. & Babanin, I.V. (2013). Profilaktika gepatozov svinej s primeneniem katozala, kovertala i jantarnoj kisloty. Uchjonye zapiski Kazanskoj GAVM im. N.Je. Baumana. 214, 282–286. [in Russian].

Quiniou, N., Dagorn, J. & Gaudre, D. (2002). Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livestock Production Science. 78 (1), 63–70.

Milligan, B.N., Fraser, D. & Kramer, D.L. (2002). Withinlitter birth weight variation in the domestic pig and its relation to pre-weaning survival, weight gain, and variation in weaning weights. Livestock Production Science. 76 (1–2), 181–191.

Jefimov, V.G. & Rakytjans'kyj, V.M. (2015). Pokaznyky klitynnogo imunitetu porosjat na doroshhuvanni za vplyvu gumatu natriju, burshtynovoi' kysloty i mikroelementiv. Naukovyj visnyk L'vivs'koi' NAVM im. S.Z. Gzhyc'kogo. 17 (3), 32–37. [in Ukrainian].

Shvec, O.M. (2008). Primenenie novogo preparata “jantarnyj biostimuljator” dlja korrekcii metabolicheskogo i immunnogo statusa zhivotnyh. Veterinarnaja patologija. 1, 92–95. [in Russian].


Abstract views: 162
PDF Downloads: 68
Published
2017-05-25
How to Cite
Kornienko, O., & Yefimov, V. (2017). Performance of sows after hepatoprotectors’ influence. Theoretical and Applied Veterinary Medicine, 5(2), 9-12. Retrieved from https://bulletin-biosafety.com/index.php/journal/article/view/101